Cogno said: "He seems to be taking complete responsibility
for his actions."
He was responsible for cashing in his ticket before the
expiration date. If he had not been so irresponsible, he
would have been paid and he would not have had to file a
claim with the Gaming Commission.
Cogno said: "The fact that the ticket has an expiration date
does not negate the casino's responsibility to pay off the
winning bet."
Huh? Why not?
Cogno said: "He asked the casino nicely to pay him the money
they owe him."
They do not owe the money because the ticket is *expired.*
I'd like to see someone try to cash in a ticket from 10 years
ago....and then claim that the casino still owes the money!
Cogno said: "Having a policy denying the payment of winning
bets after 60 days is an unsuitable business method."
Who is to say what amount of time is a *suitable* business
method? Personally, I think two months is fine. If I didn't,
wouldn't bet there.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
