> worldbefree would appear to assert that because
> Dennis (denflo) might be expected to see 1.9MM
> hand results play out, Dennis' statement suggesting
> he "not only never reach(es) the long run for dealt
> different dealt hands in a day or a year or likely
> a lifetime" is false. However, I'd say that Dennis
> is on the right track.
>
> First, it's important to clarify what the "long term"
> is, in relation to a given reference point -- it's
> generally defined as the length of play after which
> the range of probable results falls very close to the
> expected result.
I'll gladly admit that if construded as origally
presented, Dennis does not reach the long-term
for dealt hands. I also get that dealt winners/near big
winners are the key to the outcome of a session on
multi-line games. I guess I was trying to communicate
(obviously too well :) ) examples like the following:
I hold 1 high card on the bottom line and in the 100
resulting hands I see pairs, 2 pairs, 3OK, straights
etc, maybe even a royal on one of those lines. Seems
to me I'm more likely to see rare outcomes than when
playing single line. If I'm tallying my results I'd
count all these hands and would expect the casino to
credit me with all these hands played. From that
perspective this fellow's playing lot's O hands. And
vs a single line player he's getting to the long-term
faster.
P.S. Don't care a witt about the RS stuff and
didn't mean to start any controversy.
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
