sjs5572z wrote:
>>Let's see ... It's legal to drive, and it's legal to get drunk. So
>>does that mean it should be legal to drive drunk? Hell with the
>>consequences, it's my right, dammit!
>>
>>
>>
>Excellent Post Caseydog. Some smokers (not all) are so blinded by
>their addiction, that they will hide behind liberterian arguments to
>rationalize their right to light up anywhere.
>
>
I have never been called a libertarian before. Not sure if I should be
insulted or proud. I always thought this country was founded on
freedoms and a lot of those freedoms for the past 30 years, and
especially the past 7, have been under assault. I am a non smoker by
the way.
>p.s. 90 percent of the video poker players that I know are non smokers,
>i.e. good player = not self destructive = non smoker.
>
>
This is strange. The majority of VP players that I know are smokers.
We must not know the same people. Maybe you can explain how a good
player equals a non smoker.
Bob
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Earn your degree in as few as 2 years - Advance your career with an AS, BS, MS degree - College-Finder.net.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
