Small sample size for any Monte Carlo type simulation yields lots of Standard Error in the results because of the high standard deviation of Video Poker and payoff skew that comes from the Royal Flush and bonus features. When we run a simulation for Blackjack, despite the fact that 21 has mostly even money payoffs it still takes 100 million rounds or more to get the EV and Win% to settle on a number and still the Standard Error is 0.03% to 0.05% and the exact edge of extreme counts is unreliable due to the small number of hands in those buckets. Now that simulators are faster 400 million rounds is the new "standard".
"What are thoughts about using the "auto-play" option of VPW for long term simulations (10's to 100's of thousands of lines of play), to faithfully represent "real" casino results?"
__._,_.___
Posted by: vpbp2002@yahoo.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (7) |
Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.
SPONSORED LINKS
.
__,_._,___
