NOTI wrote: Of course you could afford it if the extra benefit of additional mailers was greater than a half of a percent?
You are using after-the-fact thinking.
How could I have know I was going to go on a royal binge ahead of time?
How could I have known the Suncoast was going to respond as they did?
Since then other Boyd properties have gone on their own mailer purges. Had I still be playing at those properties, I might well have been caught up in another purge before now. Many other players were. So how am I going to predict the value of "future mailers?" I can definitely feel the half-percent loss NOW in using your recommended strategy. You seem to want me to compare that to some unknown benefit of receiving mailers in the future.
I don't think anybody knows how to do this.
Even without these insurmountable problems, I don't believe the mailers there are near a half percent there for strong video poker players.
I agree with Harry's description of you. You strike me as a very bright theoretical analyst with very little tempering from the real world problems players face.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: Bob Dancer <bobdancervp@hotmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (9) |
