I don't believe 007's assertion here is correct ...
Playing a game with a RF value targeted to a 100% EV achieves a min-cost RF strategy. In other words, you maximize the profit of the endeavor by minimizing the expected cost between royals.
The meter advance has no impact on that cost, therefore is irrelevant to that strategy.
- H.
---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <007@...> wrote :
>According to Frank Kneeland, the best strategy when a team has a bank locked up is based on a 100% game. For 9/6 Jacks that would be a 4880 coin royal. It drops the royal frequency down in the 36,000's. The effect is you are milking the meter for all it's worth.
I believe Frank understands that meter movement should also be
incorporated, so that the optimal strategy for such a team, with many
idealistic assumptions, is to play at 100%, including meter movement,
so that, with a 1% meter, they'd play as if the royal made the overall
payback 99%.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (23) |
