Ken: I'm just a novice, but I believe you are correct.
On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 1:54 PM, "ken orgera keno60@hotmail.com [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Just asking, because I know you know more than I. Doesn't the frequent hands have to return less also to increase the variance?
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
From: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:18:22 -0400
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] varience question
When you double the size of the Royal flush which is a rare hand, you really do crank up the variance. The more that the rare hands increase in value the higher the variance.
Regards
A.P.
From: mailto:vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 1:02 PM
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [vpFREE] varience question
I ran this paytable on winpoker: RF-8000,sf-250,4 aces-800, 4-2,3,4's 400, 4 5-K-250, FH-45, Fl-30, Straight 25, 3 of Kind-15. two pair/job-5. I came up with a payback about 100%, but the varience clocks in at about 92%. This seem awfully high, did I miss something? Many thanks...
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
vpFREE Links: http://www.west-point.org/users/usma1955/20228/V/Links.htm
------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: Rod Carlon <vprod618@yahoo.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (5) |
