I agree that there isn't a bankroll concern, but when a play is considered to be good over a well defined long run as it was here, and when that long run will not be reached, again as well defined here, then why play it ?
It seems to me that if you aren't likely to complete enough cycles to get the average return, and the edge isn't large to begin with why play it.
We were given lots of good reasons not to play it, but I saw no good reasons to play it. I just want to know the logic behind the decision.
A.P.
________________________________
From: "Nordo123@aol.com [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
To: "vpFREE@yahoogroups.com" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LVA - 16 DEC 2014
Why does he play it AP? His bankroll is enormous compared to mine and is likely to be more than yours. The answer however is simple "an edge is an edge".
Sent from my iPhone
Posted by: Albert Pearson <ehpee@rogers.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (4) |
