In that case, the ten should be eliminated, also, so the 27 should be a 24.
----- Bob Dancer bobdancervp@hotmail.com [vpFREE] <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
007 wrote: I'd count the offsuit high cards, such as a hand like AQT4sK, so that your 27 should be a 33.
I wouldn't count such a hand because we're looking for when the 4-card flush is an error rather than the correct play. In the hand 007 cited, holding the 4-card flush would be correct.
More important than how much this particular play is worth is what other hands fall into the "bankroll preservation is more important than EV" discussion. Each "safety play" may be small in cost, but if there are a lot of them, it can add up.
Bob
I wouldn't count such a hand because we're looking for when the 4-card flush is an error rather than the correct play. In the hand 007 cited, holding the 4-card flush would be correct.
More important than how much this particular play is worth is what other hands fall into the "bankroll preservation is more important than EV" discussion. Each "safety play" may be small in cost, but if there are a lot of them, it can add up.
Bob
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
__._,_.___
Posted by: 007 <007@embarqmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (68) |
.
__,_._,___
