Now, I'm going to have to sit back and do some thinking, NOTI. Seems my intuition is skipping a cog.
Say a given strategy represents the min-cost-royal strategy for a game. If you modify the game to add a constant kickback to the player with each play, it's not at all evident that the MCR strategy is impacted at all.
It seems to me that the MCR strategy for a given game is also the MCR strategy when add any fixed component of additional return to game. (Adding a constant doesn't change the minimum point on the graph of an equation).
Can you shed a little light on my confusion?
---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <nightoftheiguana2000@...> wrote :
[Possibly unnecessary additional explanation: min-cost-royal strategy is found by adjusting the royal to get an even return, since 0-9-6 strategy with an actual 800 royal returns about 99%, if there is an additional 1% promotion package, the net return is even hence one is also at min-cost-royal strategy. I previously mistakenly said 2%, 1% is all that is needed.]
__._,_.___
Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (23) |
.
__,_._,___
