vp_wiz wrote: "What I find a bit perverse is that typically when there's discussion of minimizing bankroll risk for a game, what has been advocated by some is "min-cost-royal". For 9/6 JB, this actually involves playing a little more aggressively for the royal, eschewing all 4 card F's in preference for 3RF holds."
If your total promotion package to play is 1%, then 0-9-6 strategy is the correct min-cost-royal strategy. You are correct that if there is no promotion package, you are just playing straight 9/6 jacks, then min-cost-royal would involve more aggressively going for the royal, as you say. As always, the promotion package changes everything.
[Possibly unnecessary additional explanation: min-cost-royal strategy is found by adjusting the royal to get an even return, since 0-9-6 strategy with an actual 800 royal returns about 99%, if there is an additional 1% promotion package, the net return is even hence one is also at min-cost-royal strategy. I previously mistakenly said 2%, 1% is all that is needed.]
vpFREE FAQ Strategies
Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (20) |