Nordo123@aol.com wrote:
>At the risk of beating a dead horse this question is about the device law, specifically about the "gaining an advantage" clause. Let's say I had software that if used every hand would play 9-6 Jacks or Better at 99.5%. I can play 9-6 Jacks perfectly. What advantage did I gain? By using the device I actually lose over not using the devise.
If I were a judge, I'd either presume the opposite or not care. I
wouldn't feel the need to verify that it actually helped you. I think
the wording of the phrase is consistent with the crime being your
intent to try to gain an advantage.
__._,_.___
Posted by: 007 <007@embarqmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (10) |
.
__,_._,___
