I kind of feel I should clarify my post. I'm not making an argument for or against casino countermeasures against AP. All I'm saying is that I don't see how the South Point policy of offering beatable opportunities, but excluding people they feel can beat them is any different from the policy of other casinos. So I'm wondering what makes their policy "exemplary."
Basically the Suncoast put in opportunities and 86'd people they thought might capitalize. Other casinos put in blackjack with beatable rules and refuse the action of people they think could capitalize. Even stations put in over 100% machines, but will back off people that capitalize on larger denomination opportunies. I don't see much difference in any of these policies from what South Point does. And I think a lot of people have complained that the policies in this current paragraph are unfair (I'm not making any statement as to whether they are fair or not). What makes the South Point policy so much more fair?
__._,_.___
Posted by: seedub49@yahoo.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (15) |
.
__,_._,___
