Like he said in the article the strategies never change. Everything is based on the infinite long term.
What changes is the dependencies on the "dealt in " hands.
When you play a single line game a dealt in Royal has the same value and impact of a royal that you draw.
If you are playing 100 play an individual royal is almost insignificant. It has roughly the same value as a dealt in full house.
A dealt in royal is highly significant on multi line games and the more lines played the more significant that becomes.
Many times when playing 50 or 100 play machines in order to reduce the swings of the game I end up accomplishing the opposite because of a lack of dealt in hands. It is a puzzlement.
A.P.
From: "funny.young.guy@gmail.com [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
To: "vpFREE@yahoogroups.com" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 1:15:30 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LVA - 1 JUL 2014
To: "vpFREE@yahoogroups.com" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 1:15:30 PM
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LVA - 1 JUL 2014
Fascinating article. I enjoyed it. Sounds like there might be some more work to be done here. I mean, what *should* the multi strategies be? There's probably no (any?) easy answer to that.
On Jul 1, 2014, at 10:01 AM, "vpFREE3355 vpfree3355@gmail.com [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Bob Dancer's LVA - 1 JUL 2014
How Often Do You Win a Hand?
http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/bob_dancer/2014/0701.cfm
*************************************************
This link is posted for informational purposes
and doesn't constitute an endorsement or approval
of the linked article's content by vpFREE. Any
discussion of the article must be done in
accordance with vpFREE's rules and policies.
*************************************************
__._,_.___
Posted by: Albert Pearson <ehpee@rogers.com>
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (3) |
.
__,_._,___