noti wrote: If it's a handpay, the casino wants to know the exact person who's getting it. If it's not a handpay, the casino only cares about the total return of the machine, in other words the aggregate hold from all players combined.
Possibly you're thinking of single-line "regular" games.
Possibly you're thinking of single-line "regular" games.
I play $1 Ten Play Quick Quads and $1 Ten Play UX and sometimes $1 Ten Play something-else-I-don't-wish-to-identify-further. Royals may or may not be the highest paying jackpots. Multiple quads --- especially with some kind of multiplier --- can easily exceed $4,000 on these games.
For those of us who play these games hours at a time, royal flushes are every-10-hours experiences, assuming you play about 400 base hands per hour. If you typically play five hours at a time, getting a royal is an every-other-session-on-average occurrence. On UX, I might get 20 or more W2Gs over that 5-hour period. A casino may well react to the total of the W2Gs, but I doubt whether they pay particular attention to the number of royals.
I still maintain that getting a royal flush is usually not a particularly relevant reason to stop playing a session. Although NOTI is one of the contributors on this site whose opinion I respect the most, in this thread I think he is off base.
Bob
__._,_.___
Posted by: Bob Dancer <bobdancervp@hotmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (10) |
.
__,_._,___
