clementiyn wrote:
>I'm sure for many players this is an obvious, no-brainer, one of the first rules you learned, sort of thing. You keep the Aces, duh...
>
>But after having it come up more than a few times during practice with WinPoker on the iPad, I disagree (at least for many players).
>
>Let's say you are playing 10/7 DB at the $1 level and your bankroll is ok but not extravagant for the game, with an additional 0.20% back in comps/cashback. And a guy sitting next to you offered you a game that returns 101.15% with a little over a third the variance with no comps/cashback but you have to play it at the $10 level.
>
>The choice to keep three aces is agreeing to play a game at $50 a hand that returns 101.15% with variance of 10.
I'd look at it as playing a hand that's risking $35.
Theoretically, correct strategy, based on the Kelly Criterion, changes
after each change in bankroll. Many players don't play games that are
over their bankroll, but then their approach to strategy assumes their
bankroll is infinite.
Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (3) |