For those of you asking Bob Dancer to reveal who pays him, and why he writes what he does....
I think that is his own private business. He writes columns, he consults, he gambles, he earns a living some how. He writes his opinion. Believe him or not, your business. Whether someone is paying him to say stuff, who cares? That is irrelevant.
Make your own decisions whether to do a promotion or not. After all the hosts are paid by the casino and they sure do a LOT to get you to play there and participate in promos. Whether you do or not is up to you.
Stop asking Bob to "reveal" personal information. In my opinion it is just none of your business.
I doubt seriously many of the players here will come anywhere close to losing $100K anyway. Most have bankrolls, MUCH smaller than that and no promotion is good enough to risk everything. You have to live near Revel to take advantage of the rebate offer. Us west coast players... not worth while flying there nce a week to pck up the free play rebate.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, fivespot <fivespot55@...> wrote:
>
> Dancer writes in his column: "Whether you like it or not, the casino is
> hyper-paranoid about players trying to cheat on their rebate offer. If you
> give them no reason to suspect you are "cheating" (as defined by them),
> you'll be fine."
>
> And here we have an excellent example of why to treat anything Dancer says
> with a huge grain of salt. He has no evidence to back this assertion.
> Assuring players that they'll be fine as they consider risking $100k,
> without solid reason to believe that assurance is valid, is highly
> irresponsible.
>
> I personally believe that the complaints on WoV, by posters claiming to be
> innocent players, pass the sniff test. I don't believe the lack of more
> widespread public comment proves anything, as my experience with lawyers is
> that their first advice is always to shut up about the case.
>
> It's not impossible that it's a well-constructed disinformation campaign,
> but let's just say that I would cheerfully take vpplayer88's side of his
> proposed bet.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (3) |
