Thing is, revel is likely within their rights to deny anyone they choose the promo, even if they play within the rules, the management reserves all rights clause. Silver sevens, formerly terrible's, stiffed me on their 10% table games rebate onlosses over 1k the second time I tried to collect it. They had ample reason for them not to want me to play blackjack there based on skill level whether or not I played within the rules.
------------------------------
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 6:30 PM CDT richard d wrote:
>I would think anyone that came forward to publicly complain to a governmental agency and is a big VP player would be nervous about a having a high profile. I don't think this will jump to the mainstream press. I would not consider uspoker.com on the same level as the NYT, WSJ or Washington Post. I doubt this story will make it to the Huffington Post.
>
>
>
>
>
>--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Mickey" <mickeycrimm@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vp_wiz" <harry.porter@> wrote:
>> >
>> > had imagined that Mickey's ego was sufficiently intact that he wouldn't have come forward with a "lookee what I came up with" post)
>> >
>> >
>> I only posted it here after it became public information vis a vis WoV. But I do admit to some vanity here. I haven't been in the types of casinos you guys play for almost 7 years. Everything is totally different here. But I was extremely confident that, with hundreds of different kinds of games available these days, someone would find a way to beat the cardreaders at Revel. And I was right. Whether they get the rebates is another question.
>>
>> http://www.uspoker.com/blog/players-accuse-revel-of-not-honoring-100000-loss-rebate-promotion/4647/
>>
>> We'll see if the bigger news outlets pick up on the story.
>>
>
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (57) |
