Also what else is confusing now is the usage of VLT being synonymous with non-randomly dealt video poker, when that is not always the case. In some states, primarily newer jurisdictions like Maryland and Ohio, VLTs are required to deal poker from a random deck. Oregon VLTs are also required to deal from a random deck. They just call them VLTs because the state lottery manages them. It really all depends on the state law. But I'm sure most of us agree that offering video poker from a non-random deck is very misleading and really shouldn't be allowed in any state.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, kelso 1600 <kelso1600@...> wrote:
>
> To my knowledge, at the present time there are only two jurisdictions where the video poker in a non-Indian casino is not random -- New York and Washington State. Both of these are due to the enabling legislation. It is not a question of the casinos putting pressure on the regulators/gaming commission to allow a random deal.
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (11) |
