My comments were more in reply to the thread that this was a "cannot lose" proposition.
Anything
has the ability to be profitable but if the free slot play rebate is
less than dollar for dollar, then this becomes a gamble. Perhaps a good
gamble but it is not a sure thing. And the lower the potential return
for the free slot play rebate the more of a gamble it becomes.
Am I wrong?
> To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
> From: tringlomane@yahoo.com
> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:53:31 +0000
> Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Revel's Loss Rebate also
>
> Yeah, Bob is right. Even if Revel dropped all video poker to the state minimum of 83% (they won't actually do this), it still could be a profitable promo overall.
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Bob Dancer <bobdancervp@...> wrote:
> >
> > Kelso wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I think the big question is what games will be available after August 1 to use the free play rebate on. I would not be surprised to see all 9/6 JOB disappear and I do not believe the Gaming Commission would get involved on this happening.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I don't think this is a major issue. Even if the best game became 6-5 JoB, we'd have a 95% loss rebate
> >
> > Good players lust after even a 40% loss rebate up to $100,000. A 95% loss rebate is manna from heaven
> >
> > Playing such a bad game would be annoying but not a showstopper.
> >
> > Bob
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> vpFREE Links: http://www.west-point.org/users/usma1955/20228/V/Links.htm
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (29) |
