Please forgive an awkward attempt to invoke a little irony for having obscured my true take here ...
I simply marvel how some find that in essentially having been invited to game, players feel they should be free to walk with whatever they can grab onto, by most any means short of outright deception.
I might have a little empathy if the players didn't have any suspicion that they were engaged in behavior that wouldn't be condoned by the casino (or were at least willing to stand behind that behavior and confront any consequence).
But when the reaction to a machine malfunction is, "Oh f***!", and they abandon the machine with credits on the meter, all bets are off.
- H.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "seedub49" <seedub49@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vp_wiz" <harry.porter@> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, but the "car thief" analogy fails on a key aspect: lack of invitation ...
> >
> > The car thief has tampered with/hotwired the vehicle -- clearly accessing the vehicle in a manner that isn't normally permitted.
> >
>
> Manipulating a machine to pay you on bets you never placed is also using it "in a manner that isn't normally permitted."
>
> And regarding someone not returning a car that they took for a test drive, I would have to guess that by breaking the contract terms in which the car was loaned to them, they would also be facing criminal charges of theft.
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (14) |
