--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vpbp2002" <bjbigplayer@...> wrote:
>
>
> If the casino did not intend for such a combination of button pushes to be allowable they should not have put these machines into play or done a better job of quality control. The casino has recourse for their losses but it's against the game manufacturer not the player.
>
I guess I really don't understand this line of thought and I'm the one missing something here. So by this rationale, if someone steals my car, it is my fault for buying a car that can be hotwired or stolen by whatever means, and I should have done better quality control if i did not intend for my car to be stolen. I should try to recoup my losses from the manufacturer of the car for selling me a car that can be stolen, but the thief should not be prosecuted or in any way held accountable for exploiting the weakness.
Good to know
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (10) |
