I haven't found where Ivey or his guest have admitted anything about reading "marked cards" to their advantage. And if they requested the same deck be used on day #2, the casino had every opportunity to say no, investigate, or tell them they were not welcome to play any longer. After-the-fact accusations and unsupported assertions radiate uncertainty and weakness. In fact, they were behind $700k at one point, and no one would do that on purpose to set a game up. Ivey is no Negranu--he has a blemish-free past and is considered the best in the world at live poker. This seems like a sour grapes move on the part of the casino, and I hope he gets his money soon.
----- Reply message -----
From: "Barry Glazer" <b.glazer@att.net>
To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: 8a. Fw: [vpFREE] Re: Illegality, immorality and cheating--#2
Date: Wed, May 15, 2013 6:10 pm
In small part, I agree that there was an active role of the players in making sure the "marked" cards were easily identifiable, and that they were in use a second day.
Reply via web post
Reply to sender
Reply to group
Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic
(1)
Recent Activity:
New Members
4
New Photos
16
Visit Your Group
vpFREE Links: http://www.west-point.org/users/usma1955/20228/V/Links.htm
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send us Feedback
.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (1) |
