if the RNG is practically random, your "anomalies" are not really anomalies and any new strategy wouldn't change anything. You'd be modeling the noise and overfitting, translating to a change in your strategy based on pure noise. Future is independent of the past.
I think your comment is more interesting in other arenas....
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "nightoftheiguana2000" wrote:
>
> I find looking for pairs to be a positive technique. Human generated lists tend to have pairs (and longer strings) underrepresented while machine generated lists tend to have pairs overrepresented. Video poker can be looked at like a form of roulette, you have 10 slots, the first five dealt cards and five potential draw cards. You would look for pairs by looking for a match between the previous card in a slot and the next hand's card in that slot, the average cycle should be 52 with an sd of 7.2 . Any anomalies would of course likely effect optimum draw strategy and bet sizing.
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (2) |
