In human terms, you are trading off 20% more coin in for the privilege of
hitting quads about 2.7X faster than you normally would and with a better
quad payoff when you do ( for example 500/300/230 vs standard 400/200/125).
I have had success tackling this game using the 40/60/80 rule for session
bankroll, for example in this case ...low variance base game $1 triple play
bonus QQ.
40X$18 = $720, or for a mid variance game like DDB 60X18 = $1080. For Vegas,
Short pay versions of QQ rules, as I've only seen the full pays at South
Point and Green Valley Ranch. I would not recommend playing short-pays these
because quad droughts do happen, and those extra 5 coins back on the ST,
FL, FH really add up and keep you alive longer.
...best Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "vp_wiz" harry.porter@verizon.net>
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 10:42 AM
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: A "Quick" Question ...
> As "quick" reply, I'd envision that a game which which strips away 20% of
> the base game wager between quad hits to have reasonably steep variance.
>
> in fact, by essentially reallocating approx 20% of the game return from
> non-quad hands to quad hits, I'd look for the multiline Jacks experience
> to be "quickened" to one approximating standard multiline DDB play.
>
>
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (4) |
