Um, yeah, Rob -- I have actually met someone in Nevada Gaming Control. Several, in fact. Guys and gals with badges, guns and actual authority. I know cause I called them to investigate, and they came. In every case but one, they sided with me and things changed. In other cases I reported a violation anonymously, and later found agents swarming over the afflicted joint with a fine tooth comb. I also once met personally the head of the Gaming Control Lab, in his office, where trained people with real equipment were doing real work to keep Nevada games honest.
It must be nice to be relieved of reality's heavy yoke, pulling statements out of your ass whenever the urge to pontificate strikes. For the sucker, all the world may indeed be "based on trust." The rest of us mostly prefer fact and rational thought.
Sent from TC's iPad
On Dec 17, 2012, at 3:32 PM, "rob.singer1111@yahoo.com" <rob.singer1111@yahoo.com> wrote:
> If you actually know someone in Nevada Gaming, you'll find that strict regulation and enforcement is mostly a concept only. It's mainly based on trust on all ends. I doubt Calif. is any different, esp. with all those Indian casinos.
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "nightoftheiguana2000" <nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com>
> To: <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Ca regulations
> Date: Mon, Dec 17, 2012 11:42 am
> They should have been checking the return of the machine, but that could have still been favorable for the casino if players weren't betting max or were using the wrong strategy or making play mistakes or playing other games other than the one with the overlay. They may not have been checking the return of individual machines, instead just checking a bank of machines, and the bank may have been favorable for the casino. And maybe 100%+ games are prohibited in California and elsewhere, but what's the penalty? There is none. Name me a casino anywhere that's been fined for having a 100%+ game? There are plenty of examples of casinos that have been fined for cheating or violating civil rights. Is it also prohibited for state lotteries to go over 100%+ return?
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (2) |
