A professional gambler should assume that everything he or she does to win money is regarded as undesirable by the casino. I see nothing particularly special, especially morally, about going into one in which he or she has been 86ed. If that's wrong, maybe playing FPDW is, too.
----- Luke Fuller <kungalooosh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bob said, "Nobody here found anything wrong with her doing it the previous
> 20 times...."
>
> That is completely false.
>
> If Laurie played in a casino, in which she was trespassed (whether on a
> casino offer or not), she was wrong. Period. It makes no difference
> whether she was 'caught' or not.
>
> Laurie and anyone else who enters an establishment after being barred are
> wrong for doing so and should pay the price for their actions.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Bob Dancer <bobdancervp@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > Laurie likely �got away� with this type of thing 20 times previously where
> > she collected on an offer after previously being barred. (If you think
> > she�s been barred from casinos 200 times, you�re almost certainly on the
> > low side.) This time she didn�t collect on the offer. Nobody here found
> > anything wrong with her doing it the previous 20 times because she was
> > successful then and they never heard about it. They are only criticizing
> > her now because this is the time she got busted and it made the papers.
> >
> > <SNIP>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> vpFREE Links: http://www.west-point.org/users/usma1955/20228/V/Links.htm
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (12) |
