[vpFREE] Re: Shackleford's top parlay on GWAE

 


On a ESPN radio a day or two before the game, a gentleman in charge of posting the prop bets at the Las Vegas Hotel (was the LV Hilton) said the current odds on the safety there were 6-1 and he thought they might go down to 5-1. He added that most tourists don't want to vote on the "no" so that affects the movement of the odds. He added that when there is a safety or over-time, the casinos take a bath on those bets.

LA Bum

---------------------------------------

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "tooncesthecatwhocoulddriveacar" <tooncestdc@...> wrote:
>
> Has noone on here mentioned Shackleford's recommendation on Gambling With an Edge of betting "No Safety" for about -1000 when the true odds are 19-1? I nearly put $1300 on it but balked at the crappy -1300 odds at Caesar's Palace. Then just got off the plane to see how much money I saved! I figured a fair number of people on this board lost their shirt.
>
> Btw, I think Super Bowls in Indy must be gaffed. Safeties happen at a much larger rate than would be predicted. :)
>
> Sammy Katz
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___