dealt4oak wrote:
>There is nothing wrong with changing machines. If Im playing a non progressive and the next machine, or a machine on another bank, has the same full pay game I move because I just cant sit at the same machine for long periods of time. If it doesn't matter mathematically to change it shouldn't matter if I move to create a break or see some new scenery. Sometimes a good stretch is good enough but my back and ass thank me for moving around the casino. Cold and hot machines are part of the psychology of playing vp. I see no problem with making myself feel better about moving to a machine with the same game because I cant hit a quad after 1000+ hands. Full pay machines are full pay machines, its one long session.
Didn't we just discuss this recently?
There might be nothing wrong with changing machines, but there is
something "wrong" with the misconceptions that can motivate it. If
it's all "one long session," why change machines if you "cant hit a
quad after 1000+ hands?"
