I thought about 10c/10-play...however, I think 4000 hands in a day is a very do-able thing and it will give me plenty of time actually ON that machine (rather than having idle time spent WANTING to gamble more)
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vp_wiz" <harry.porter@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "TIMSPEED" <corvetteracing87@> wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to decide what would be better..
> > I have a play with the following details:
> > 2% cashback
> > .35% comps
> > $20k coin-in per month (2 sessions of $10k each) must be given
> > 9/6 JoB (all variations)
> >
> > Would I be better to go with 5c 10-play or 50c 1-play?
> > In my thinking, the only difference would be the swings, right?
> > With 5c/10-play my swings would be like +/- $200
> > With 50c/1-play my swings would be like +/- $2000
> > 40k hands per session vs. 4k hands per session...
> >
>
>
> All other things equal, as you note, the expected swings of 10-play would be nominal compared to single line at the same total wager. Aside from that, the options are EV equivalent.
>
> The key issue is that generally, I find I'm only able to score about 70%-80% of the wagers in any given length of time on 10-play vs single line. Thus, you're looking at a longer session to achieve the same coin-in. Not too stiff a price to pay for the stronger bankroll security.
>
> FWIW, if it's an option, you will likely find 10c/10-play 9/6 JoB well within your 50c/1-play bankroll risk tolerance (up to the equivalent coin-in), and thus might be another attractive option. Just be aware that the ability to push up your total session coin-in does introduce a new bankroll risk.
>
> - H.
>
