Quarter Triple Play is probably way below the stakes that Bob Dancer plays
for.
For the low to mid-roller the game you describe sounds like a very
intelligent (and also very fun) play.
(I wish we had something like that in the Chicago Area where I am from.)
The only bad thing is that triple play requires the same hold for all three
hands. If the progressives are very different then this could hurt the EV a
little bit.
the common thought was to average the progressives to determine the strategy
to follow. Probably not best but certainly the easiest.
From: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vpFREE@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Luke Fuller
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 9:51 PM
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 23 AUG 2011
Bob states - about Orleans - that, "Without the multipliers, there are no
intelligent plays there." The word 'intelligent' can be subjective. But,
I'd like to know if the following game at Orleans is 'intelligent' or not.
They have quarter triple-play Double Bonus machines, which have separate
progressives royals on each hand (top, bottom, and middle) and another
progressive for a dealt royal. The pay schedule for this game is 9/7/5,
which - according to the Wizard of Odds - makes the return 0.991065 (without
any progressives).
After adding the slot club and the progressives for the various royals,
can't this be considered an intelligent play?
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:47 AM, vpFREE Administrator
<vpfreeadmin@cox.net <mailto:vpfreeadmin%40cox.net> >wrote:
> Bob Dancer's LV Advisor Column - 23 AUG 2011
>
> "Being Restricted"
>
> http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/bob_dancer/2011/0823.cfm
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
