--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Frank" <frank@...> wrote:
>
> I'm open to suggestions. Really...really open.
>
> If you are against putting in less known games, what would you suggest we do instead, to make the bank more sustainable for the casino and more fun for the player.
>
> This started out as a vpFREE request and idea. I see no problem in including everyone's advice in its continued success and existence.
>
> Think about it really hard and then cry havoc and let slip the dogs of good M progressive suggestions.
>
> You'll need to check your player hat at the door for this brain storming session to be fruitful. Remember it has to be good for player AND the casino.
>
> Put yourself in my shoes and imagine yourself walking into the VP's office and pitching the idea. Try not to get me shot. I still haven't ridden on a pink elephant.
>
This is a challenging dilemma. The more I think about it the more I realize how few "different" types of video poker there really are.
Essentially the White Hot Aces and TB-Plus and Super Aces games are just different twists on Double Double Bonus.
I was first thinking about the Joker games they have back East where the 5-of-a-kind is the biggest payoff instead of a royal. I have never played that.
I think either you or Bob mentioned on the Show last week the game of One-Eyed-Jacks. I have never played that either but I understand that is extremely difficult.
Perhaps a Deuces-Joker type game. Or how about a Bonus Deuces Wild? Or a Double Deuces Wild?
I still think the All American would fit. It's "different" enough, and the 7-7-7 pay table is in the low 96% range.
