Well that's more or less correct. It's closer to 70% of the time and my criteria for "a play" is higher than almost anyone I know. These days I won't sit down for less than $60 and hour, unless I have an ulterior motive.
Most consider $20 an hour decent wages. Look at the folks pounding away on FPDW at the Palms. I did my time, back in the day, on similar games, but I didn't get a teeshirt.
Note: Many of the games reach 102.5% in the low $3,000 range if you count cash-back, meter-rise, and mailer. Why is it that everyone seems to forget that all the perks apply to these games that apply to non-progressives and the meter goes up while you play???
~FK
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "mike" <melbedewy1226@...> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it take about a $4000 royal on these quarter games to hit 102.5%?
> In other word, they would be unplayayable, by your definition, over 99% of the time?
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Frank" <frank@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> > This assumes you are playing with about a 2.5% edge on quarters and at least a 1.5% edge on dollars.
> >
> >
>
