[vpFREE] Re: The Non Sequitur of Progressives

 

I was not referring to a progressive one plays at 104%. Walking off the M is no big deal as most of the win is in immediate expectancy.

In the old days we would get on high MR progressives at 100% and play only for the amount the meter would progressive as our profit.

There was a time when we even played the 2% Hilton at 99% and gave up half the MR win. In scenarios like this one would not wish to pump the meter up and then leave.

Those scenarios may no longer exist. I was waxing nostalgic.

~FK

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Bartop" <bobbartop@...> wrote:
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Frank" <frank@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On a 3% single meter you would be loath to walk away before the JP hit.
> >
>
>
> If the game's theoretical return is 104% when you sit down, and it is 105% a half hour later when you suddenly feel like going home and taking a nap, why would one give a crap about how much one personally put into it? I don't get it.
>
> So Frank, at one of those extravagant and gluttonous meals you were talking about on the show the other night, you suddenly feel like leaving some carrots on your plate. What's the big deal?
>

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___