--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, fivespot <fivespot55@...> wrote:
>
> i'm fascinated by this, because it's a virtuouso example of playing
> both sides of casinos vs. players for personal gain, which bob dancer
> is such an expert at.
>
> dancer to players: these are 96%+ games with a 4% meter feeding all
> the games, so there'll always be something positive to play! by the
> way, you'll need my advice to play it correctly!
>
> dancer to M: players will be playing at 95% or worse on the base game
> due to chasing the royal hard, so with only a 4% meter, you'll have a
> huge edge! by the way, pay me for this idea!
>
> one of these two statements is true. one is false. no bonus points for
> guessing which is which.
>
I don't understand why both statements cannot be correct. I look forward to someone explaining it to me.
By the way, we don't absolutely need his advice to play it correctly. Armed with a pad of paper and his software on my computer, I can figure it out myself. But still, I want to hear what he has to say later. He's a teacher. And he's a smart teacher too!
