bobbartop@yahoo.com wrote:
> http://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/bob_dancer/2011/0510.cfm
i'm fascinated by this, because it's a virtuouso example of playing
both sides of casinos vs. players for personal gain, which bob dancer
is such an expert at.
dancer to players: these are 96%+ games with a 4% meter feeding all
the games, so there'll always be something positive to play! by the
way, you'll need my advice to play it correctly!
dancer to M: players will be playing at 95% or worse on the base game
due to chasing the royal hard, so with only a 4% meter, you'll have a
huge edge! by the way, pay me for this idea!
one of these two statements is true. one is false. no bonus points for
guessing which is which.
> I applaud the effort by Bob & Frank, and look forward to playing at The M. Bravo!
it is generally not a good thing for smart players when bob dancer,
author of "beware of smart players", becomes associated with a casino.
this is no exception.
there will be opportunities created by this progressive bank. there
are with any progressive bank, when the suckers feed the meter, and
the sharps take it down. this is no different.
but as a player at M, i am much more disheartened by the news that
they are associating with dancer, which may reduce future major
opportunities, than i am encouraged by any potential minor
opportunities at this bank.
best wishes,
five
