--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Frank" <frank@...> wrote:
>
> I may have given Bob the basic idea for including "not-held" strategy elements into his strategies, but he's taking the basic idea to the next level and adapting it for use in our modern VP world.
>
********
That "Not Held" is a flickering light bulb now turned-on in my head, a novel idea, for teaching TTT. But Top-Down versus Bottom-Up could be a clue about the non-conventinal nomanclutre that you use.
I cringe, like most of us, when I see 6/9 for Jacks or Better (JoB) or 5/9 for Deuces Wild (FPDW). You just look at the bottoms first, then the tops.
OBTW, Bob's article still has an "F" where a "T" should be, IMO.
Quoting:
"Frank's strategy (using somewhat different, albeit comparable notation to what I use) lists SF4 1i 2h on his chart --- but without the comment 'NEVER HELD.'"
BS
