I try to keep life simple by relating it to the golden rule so that I can
sleep well at night. But it doesn't bother me if friends do something
different than what I would have done. As for the "right" thing to do, we
usually know what we should do, but there are many situations where it's a
judgment call. In cases like this, bunts are as good as homers as they both make
progress. But if you see a lot of strikeouts, then you have to evaluate your
team-mates. These are character-defining moments & you'll see a few
people with a high batting average. Those are the ones you want on your team.
In a message dated 3/4/2011 8:17:16 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
vpFREE@yahoogroups.com writes:
_Re: A "winning" moment _
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vpFREE/message/112577;_ylc=X3oDMTJzYjFkaXA5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzQ2NDEwMTcEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1
MDY1NzMyBG1zZ0lkAzExMjU3NwRzZWMDZG1zZwRzbGsDdm1zZwRzdGltZQMxMjk5Mjk4NjI4)
Posted by: "Tom Robertson" _007@embarqmail.com _
(mailto:007@embarqmail.com?Subject= Re:%20A%20"winning"%20moment) _mdmgyn _
(http://profiles.yahoo.com/mdmgyn)
Fri Mar 4, 2011 11:13 am (PST)
<<<<<I find impossible difficulties in any principl e and have concluded
that a middle way, that judges each situation by itself, is best.I'm
interested to see how far those who say that giving such unintended and unearned
benefits back is always "right" and
"good," without qualifying it by the context, will take their
principles. If taking advantage of the mistakes of others is always
wrong, doesn't that rule out all advantage gambling? How could there be
any distinction between individuals and corporations, since
corporations are all owned, ultimately, by individuals? >>>>>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
