[vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's comment about higher stakes play

 

You took the words right out of my mouth. I wrote a rebuttal article to the one Bob did on stress. I believe he's going to use it next week.

My criteria for declaring something "a play" was a 2% edge. This way one could run a little bad and still make money.

Bob would argue that this is no longer possible. I would agree, all the progressives I've played this year were at least 4% edges.

As long as you are happy with a 90/10% scouting to play ratio, it's still possible to get some good overlays.

Bob & I are very different in precisely the same way.

~FK

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "bobbartop" <bobbartop@...> wrote:
>
> In his last article he was discussing "stress", and in it he mentioned that $5 and up players would be thrilled to get a half percent edge, and frequently a quarter percent is higher than they can find.
>
> I cannot tell you the many times when I have left my WinPoker running on high speed simulation and come back an hour later and it's run some several gazillion hands. I mean, literally, 10 to 20 million hands. And, not always, but often enough, the result is OVER a quarter percent off from the "expected" result.
>
> So if what Bob said is true, and I certainly believe him, these BIG players like him would not be assured they're going to end up in the black even after a decade or more of play. Wow! Talk about a hard way to make an easy living!
>

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

.

__,_._,___