An implicit waiting list is getting more popular. If someone is waiting for a machine and a player gives it to someone whom the person waiting was there before, a complaint to management can get the machine, even at casinos which are aren't explicitly anti-AP.
----- Frank <frank@progressivevp.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Unless you are in a casino that runs a waiting list, like the Old LV Club did, you can pass your machine to whomever you want--taking preference over anyone waiting.
>
> If you give up your machine and just leave, the next person in line gets it.
>
> We also had special deals with the other teams to handle any situation and avoid squabbles in a casino.
>
> ~FK
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Mr. Hogua" <ckonwin@...> wrote:
> >
> > If there's a promotion underway that causes more players to want to play than there are machines, there will be players waiting in the wings for a machine to become available. When someone does leave a machine, what is the etiquette regarding what "waiting" player gets the machine?
> >
> > Is there an unofficial queue that forms for each machine (or bank of machines)? Is it first come first serve? I assume the latter is more likely. If that's true, would it be proper etiquette for a player currently on a machine to "pass" it to a partner/friend when done playing even if the player wasn't there before the others waiting for the machine?
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [vpFREE] Re: Etiquette Regarding "Locking up" a machine?
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___