Again, I haven't really been doing this long enough to think what
I've experienced is representative of what should be expected, but
the closest I've come to "clusters" would be stringing together maybe
3 or 4 royals with an average of 25000 hands or so in between--and of
course the occasional 2-royal days. But a buddy of mine who only
plays around 10000 hands a week had a month where he hit 8 royals and
has never gone more than roughly 75,000 hands without one. I know
psychologically when you are in a drought you feel like you should
be "due," but unfortunately there is really no such thing. Whether
it has been 200,000 hands or 2 hands since your last royal, your
chance to hit are always the same (assuming you are playing the same
strategy as opposed to playing differently because of a
progressive)
will have more royals than expected, some will have less, and some
will be on target. I know that isn't a helpful or useful statement,
but I think that might be all that can really be said.
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.
>
>
> In a message dated 2/10/2008 5:58:52 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> wincerwj@... writes:
>
>
>
>
> My longest royal drought was 275,000 hands, but I've only been
doing
> this a couple years so I'm sure I'll see a longer one eventually.
> Actually, I just ended a 200,000 hand drought on Thursday. I hope
you
> end yours soon too!
>
>
>
>
>
> +
> +
>
> Do you find things even out..... like a cluster of royals?
>
> Grumpy
>
>
>
> ************
Music.
> (http://music.
NCID=aolcmp00300000
> 48)
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
