--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.
>
> --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.
> >
> > For any activity you want to do, there are non-smoking venues you
> can
> > go to. If you choose to go to a place that allows smoke instead,
> > then that is the sacrifice you are making. I assure you that if
a
> > non-smoking casino all of a sudden put in a 10% play on dollars,
> > smokers would go there. They would realize that the sacrifice
they
> > are making to take part in this play is that they can't smoke.
> They
> > would not try to change the place into a smoking venue, thereby
> > eliminating a place for non-smokers to play. Sounds like the "un-
> > intelligent, ignorant" group (as some here have suggested about
> > smokers) are acting more reasonably then the all those
enlightened
> > non-smokers trying to impose their way of life on everyone else.
> >
>
> Please explain how a smokers health is put a risk for abstaining in
a
> non-smoking casino. Oh, and be sure to add just how the employees
are
> put at risk too.
>
Oops, sorry, I forgot that I had already cut out the part of your
post quoting my earlier post. If you tell me which part of the above
excerpt seems to imply that non-smoking environments are dangerous to
the health of smokers, I'll be happy to elucidate my true meaning.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
