mickeycrimm wrote:
> So everyone you disagree with should keep their mouths shut?
> Who did you say was ignorant? Have you ever read any of the
> UNLV studies?
>
> Casino executives don't want to ban smoking for one reason.
> Every serious study, not propaganda, study, they have read
> shows a 10% loss of gaming win across the State of Nevada.
> That's not a recession, sir, that's a depression--
> corresponding layoffs. They will ban smoking when the
> cost/benefit analysis shows the lawsuits will cost them more
> than the loss of revenue.
>
> The problem with you big mouth anti-smokers is all you
> do is run your mouths. When the smoking bans kick in
> you don't show up to support the businesses who lose
> the smokers as customers. That's the reason for the
> loss of revenue. Candy Asses. Stone cold candy asses.
I have not read the UNLV studies, but I find mickeycrimm'
analysis of casino management's thinking most likely to be
accurate.
However....
mickeycrimm, are you suggesting that there is a moral
obligation for anyone to support any business? I don't
think that opinion will find much support on this forum
or elsewhere for that matter. Also, I find your
denegration of non-smokers for not supporting a
business that obeys a smoking ban to be unwarranted.
I find it much easier to support the opinion that everyone
is morally justified in asserting their right to a workplace
that is not unneccesarily dangerous to their health.
Gamb00ler
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
