For the first six months or so of my $1 10/7 DB play, I went the conservative route and held a pat "Aces full" vs the minutely better trip Aces hold.
And after having been whipsawed by the game I realized that the guaranteed $50 payout on the held full house, on those infrequent dealt "Aces full" occasions, wasn't making a dent in my overall win/loss experience in the game.
So, in what was an exceeding rare moment for me, I said "screw it!, and started going for the thrill of chasing the Aces (in that one situation).
If "bankroll considerations" becomes a driving force in what you hold in this instance, your bankroll isn't hardy enough for the game ... period.
- H.
---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <h_dunbar@...> wrote :
Lone Locust is correct, but both decisions are pretty close, and making the wrong choice is almost costless.
You do about 1% better by holding trip A's vs Aces full. Since dealt Aces full occurs about once in 9,000 hands, the overall net gain from playing that hand correctly is 0.0001%. That's a $1 saving for every $1 million in bets. I'm sure that if you have any bankroll considerations at all at the level you're playing, you're better off keeping the full house. (I just wanted to get that in before NOTI said it! ;>)
__._,_.___
Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (14) |
SPONSORED LINKS
.
__,_._,___
