I'm with you. This researcher implicitly suggests casinos are too liberal with machine holds based upon a narrow window on play on a couple of machines that suggests that slot players are indifferent to machine hold, without any examination of the player's casino wide experience.
In the larger picture, if a player has habitually played against a house hold of 5% and that hold is increased to 10%, the player may attribute the poorer return to bad luck initially, but it won't take long for him to realize that his money is typically holding him for a much shorter time in the casino. Conditioned to a higher return (longer play) experience, this player will walk to another casino and won't be likely to return, even if he/she finds a similar 10% hold experience next door.
For a researcher who prides himself on his casino operation expertise, this study has a surprisingly narrow and rather simple-minded focus.
---In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, <irdd@...> wrote :
this guys thinking is really bad...of course if you just one machine it probably won't be noticed by many players...but change the whole casino and players will definitely notice....
__._,_.___
Posted by: harry.porter@verizon.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (3) |
Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.
SPONSORED LINKS
.
__,_._,___
