I think that Sheriff Lombardo was stretching for an answer to the constant questions he was getting from the
media etc. If you watched any of the Sheriff's briefings in the day or two after --you'll note how he is constantly
begging the press to give more time rather than field the annoying (to him) barrage of questions he was getting.
I'm sure these questions persisted and in the Sheriff's mind -- this answer made perfect sense to him -- and probably
the rest of the world. . . . As you can tell -- the Sheriff must not be a gambler and doesn't have a clue as to a gambler's mentality.
I don't think knowing how much he won or lost would help anything -- it's all relative. It's only what was in Paddock's mind
at this time that was important and we all know the ups and downs of gambling -- even with a positive or near positive play it can be
a downer--sometimes. (how many discussions have we read here about going xxx cycles without a royal?) and add to that the fact
that Paddock seemed to be an intensely private person. . . . I'm guessing we'll never know.
Jean H
From: "vpking77@yahoo.com [vpFREE]" <vpFREE@yahoogroups.com>
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 2:01 PM
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock's quest for 'p erfect play' on video poker
George Knapp's interview with Sheriff Lombardo showed total ignorance when it comes to video poker and shooter's level of play. First of all Paddock played $25 VP and generated over a million dollars in coin-in when he played. If he played at Caesars Entertainment he would earn a 7 Stars card every couple of days. He also played 10 play $25 VP. Was easily one of top level players at each property he played at. As far as him being on a losing streak that could only be properly evaluated if the casino took into account the amount of free play he was receiving. Obviously he would be net loser on the game itself if you didn't account for the free play. No VP games he was playing returned over 100%. As previous poster said his appearance was meaningless. He had huge lines of credit at the casinos. If your playing 10 play $25 VP you can win and lose hundreds of thousands of dollars per night. Every couple of hands your generating a taxable. You also notice none of the casinos are disclosing how much Paddock won or lost in a year or what level customer he was. If the sheriff knows how much he lost over the last two years why not state it. Why is it private. The public is entitled to know how much Paddock lost and if he was in debt. Being transparent means disclosing everything.
__._,_.___
Posted by: K/J Haka <kjhaka@yahoo.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (7) |
Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.
.
__,_._,___
