bornloser wrote: "In my opinion, I think that we are in a semantics situation with the term "royal chasing". If one is playing "maxEV strategy", you are simply playing the strategy, not "chasing the royal". It is always GREAT to get a RF, and we all like to get them, but, that should not be construed that one is "chasing the royal"."
OK, so you admit that it's "always GREAT to get a RF", but you're very stoic in your approach. If you had a one card draw to a royal, you would be coldly calculating the EV in your head, like Clint Eastwood, your pulse still a steady 30 beats per minute, not salivating over the chance of actually hitting the royal? Like a Shoalin monk, you would be totally indifferent to the actual results of your draw, if you actually hit a royal, you wouldn't even allow yourself to sigh, you'd simply acknowledge: "I knew it had to happen eventually, just one of 47 possible outcomes"? I'm curious about what it is that you object to about the phrase "chasing the royal"? Does it sound too degenerate? Too hedonistic?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (18) |
