I share your frustration in the "mystery multiplier", but most of your issue here is a result of your assumption that the multipliers are randomly assigned. I don't believe that is stated to be the case in their terms and conditions, and even without any of this discussion, I always assumed the multipliers wouldn't be random nor all multipliers equally likely. Why would you assume that all the multipliers were equal or close to equally likely to be assigned to your selection? Your data doesn't surprise me at all. I just don't see any wrongdoing by Sam's. Perhaps shaming them by exposing this data might help change things by making this information widely known.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: caribou321@yahoo.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (12) |
