Good morning thanks again. Now we are almost drilling down to what i'm asking ?
Is 800 events a significant sample or too short term and meaningless ?
If after 800 events players 3 and 4 win more often than players 1 and 2, should one conclude the number of electronic entries actually being entered into the drawing are being, altered , in some way ? Should one conclude either 3 and 4 are in fact getting extra entries OR players 1 and 2 entries are being cut OR totally eliminated in certain drawings or both ? OR is 800 events not significant enough and I should go another 800 events to be certain the entries are being manipulated ? I hope that clarifies what i'm asking. Thanks again to anyone who can drill down on my questions.
Sent from Windows Mail
From: vpFREE3355 vpfree3355@gmail.com [vpFREE]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 3:58 AM
To: vpFREE3355 vpfree3355@gmail.com [vpFREE]
By the way, you would like to know the number of total tickets, but it is not necessary.
If you know the number of tickets for players 1,2,3, and 4 and how often each of them won,you can ignore the other results and just count the events where one of the key players won.
This means you won't know anything about the results for the group, but you will get usefulinformation when comparing these 4 players to each other. Just count total wins for these 4 players and total wins for each and total tickets for each and use these with the confidence interval math.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Posted by: <hjclasvegas6969@yahoo.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (8) |
