It's not clear to me that simply assigning zero to the royal flush is
sufficient to determine optimal strategy. You really ought to assign a
negative value to the RF, specifically its nominal value minus the net
present value of all future expectation times the chance of your getting
kicked out by hitting this royal. Setting it to zero is very lazy thinking.
Cogno
-----Original Message-----
From: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vpFREE@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 4:25 PM
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: Bob Dancer's LVA Column - 19 JAN 2016
Vegasvpplayer asked: "Just curious, what does a max-non-Royal strategy for
NSUD look like"
5FL>4RF>5ST
4FL>3RF>2P
4STi>JTs>T876o
average return = 0.992%
variance = 20.6
average royal cycle = 66,598
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Posted by: nightoftheiguana2000@yahoo.com
------------------------------------
vpFREE Links: http://www.west-point.org/users/usma1955/20228/V/Links.htm
------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
Posted by: Cogno Scienti <cognoscienti@hotmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (8) |
